And what was the result? You personal preference?
Regards,
CC
---------------------------
derago, Wiesenstr. 3-5, 79807 Lottstetten, Germany, http://www.derago.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaroslav Lukesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Layer 2 vs Layer 3 (was RE: 2MP3 from cassette at LAME 3.85)
> | Odes�latel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> | On 27-Jul-2000 Jaroslav Lukesh wrote:
> | > Above 192kbps is much better MPEG 1 or 2 Layer 2.
> | I still haven't seen any documenation or listening tests which support
> this.
> | Anyone seen any references worth checking on?
> |
>
> Refferences no. But personal listening experience with proffesional
> (hardware) equipment. I put package for cooledit (it works with cooledit
> 2000, confirmed by friend) from syntrillium at our corporate web at
>
> www.k-net.cz/!/lossaud.zip (564k)
>
> Here are MP3 decoder, source, MP2 encoder and decoder, RealMedia plugin (is
> better than G2) and script for dynamic pre-processing of compressed media
> (not only for realaudio, MP3 is great too). All was few years ago at
> syntrillium FTP, not available now.
>
> Regards
>
> Jaroslav Lukesh
> --------------------------------------------------
> note: (Bill) Gates to Hell!
>
>
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
