Robert Hegemann wrote:
> > Btw, after a test run, I noticed that 405 bytes differ (at least
> > according to the simple cmp program I wrote :). Is that something to
> > worry about?
>
> Well, for me using the gogo routine decreases the sound quality a lot.
> It's true, it's fast, but I'm not an assembler freak so I don't know
> what's wrong with it.
I was a bit unclear on it, but the test run was with a plain compile (no
assembler or hacks activated; just plain C). That worries me a little
(after all, 400 is a lot more than 30)... :)
(Btw, which optimization do you mean with "the gogo routine"?)
--
Magnus Holmgren
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
