This is a forwarded message From: Adriano B. Mitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: r3mix.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, August 14, 2000, 12:28:23 AM Subject: How come?! ===8<==============Original message text=============== As you suggested me, I've tested two suposed 3.86b DLL flavors (http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/dll_386ic.zip and http://www.maindex.com/lame/beta/Win32-DLL/lame-3_86BetaDLL.zip) and compared to the EXE (http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/lame386ic.zip) version. In fact, the result was REALLY CONFUSING!!! Both DLLs gave different results from the EXE - and MORE: they gave different results EACH other!!! The EXE version of LAME 3.86b, as you said, is faster and beter, but NOT the DLL ones. How come? Please, tell it urgently to the people! And if you find a correctly working DLL version, please tell me. Adriano. ===8<===========End of original message text=========== if anyone has an idea why this is? thanks Roel/r3mix/... -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
