Hello Bart, Friday, August 25, 2000, 5:49:31 PM, you wrote: BK> anyone can explain this? I've done so >10 times to people that write my site (r3mix.net) maybe it's time to ask the author of that (old) article to write reproducable test with more founding. to his ears 128k lame sounded worse than FhG. Perfectly possible I think, but what it has to do about lame failing I don't know... -- Best regards, Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame fails tests? Bart Koelman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame fails tests? Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame fails tests? Zia Mazhar
