I hope you guys correct all the errors. Please make sure that no new bugs show up
on the next beta release! If it's very much "broken" I think it'll be best to
start again with a previous alpha, one before someone broke it. Thank you all who
are working hard on making LAME such a great encoder!
- Zia
"Sigbj�rn Skj�ret" wrote:
> >:: Please check that your code compiles and works ok before checking it in
> >:: to the CVS ...
> >::
> >That doesn't help fully to solve the problem. Compiler and runtime libs are
> >different. So the check can only be done for one (or two) compilers.
>
> Still, it's not fun when certain files fail to compile because of silly
> errors (like conflicting prototypes). ;)
>
> >Currently my aim is, that the program is compilable with:
> > gcc 2.95.2
> > g++ 2.95.2
>
> I run gcc 2.95.(3) and SAS/C (the latter is usually much more helpful on
> warnings, and still much more forgiving on "errors")...
>
> >:: Also it would be nice if you cast types that don't match the functions
> >:: types into the correct one
> >Casting is a bad thing. Correct the reason for the casting, not the warning
> >(or the error in C++) itself. See Ada Rationale. It is Ada related, but the
> >reasons are the same for every procedural language like C, Pascal, Ada, ...
>
> Ofcos, as I said, the best thing is to use the correct one to begin with, but
> if that isn't possible, atleast cast the value into the correct one.
>
> - CISC
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
