************************************************************************
*** WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING ***
************************************************************************
*
* The e-mail-message appended below is list- or mailserver-related
*
* That type of mail will by definition not be processed on this system
* and in general is not accepted in the fidonet.org-domain.
*
* To avoid these bouncings the listkeeper is kindly requested to
* remove any subscription coming from a z2.fidonet.org-style address.
*
* If you have reason to believe your message was removed without due
* reason then kindly inform '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
*
************************************************************************
From: Mathew Hendry @2:292/862
To: Sergey Sapelin @2:5020/1844.33
Subj.: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame source C++ compatible?
Dated: 02 Sep 00 02:48:11
[processed here: 06 Sep 00 10:03:29]
@TOPT 33
@INTL 2:5020/1844 2:292/862
@MSGID: carla 3d294f4f
@REPLYADDR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@REPLYTO: 2:292/862@fidonet UUCP
@PID: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
@CHRS: LATIN-1 2
@RFC-Received: from geek.rcc.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.15.234.212])
by infomag.iguana.be (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA03131 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 02:59:33 +0200
@RFC-Received: (from majordom@localhost) by geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) id
CAA00334 for mp3encoder-list; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 02:43:55 +0200
@RFC-X-Authentication-Warning: geek.rcc.se: majordom set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
@RFC-Received: from hose.pipex.net (hose.mail.pipex.net [158.43.128.58]) by
geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA00331 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 2 Sep 2000 02:43:54 +0200
@RFC-Received: from carla (usercb92.uk.uudial.com [62.188.151.5]) by
hose.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F25E4505 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 2 Sep 2000 01:47:52 +0100 (BST)
@RFC-Message-ID: <001401c01477$89e90f30$23f26ac3@carla>
@RFC-References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@RFC-X-Priority: 3
@RFC-X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
@RFC-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Mathew Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "Segher Boessenkool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > How to compile lame on a system where only a C++ compiler is available
(the
> > C compiler costs extra money)? Currently lame generates nearly
uncountable
> > errors with a C++ compiler.
>
> Put
>
> extern "C" {
> }
>
> around everything? (Around a whole file is ok, I believe).
That only affects the linkage of functions (e.g. disables name mangling).
There's no easy way to do it in general. I've done it a few times for some
fairly large pieces of code, and it's no fun at all. Then there's the
maintenance...
Is the C compiler expensive? :)
-- Mat.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
@Via ifmail 2:292/862@fidonet, Sat Sep 2 2000 at 02:59 (2.14-tx8.10)
@Via D'Bridge 1.58 2:292/854 09/06 09:56
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
