The following outputs have the following meanings:
[ ] p = 0.00%, never used
[%..] 0.00% < p < 0.01%
[%.0] 0.01% < p < 0.05%
[%.1] 0.05% <= p < 0.15%
[%.2] 0.15% <= p < 0.25%
...
[%.9] 0.85% <= p < 0.95%
[ 1%] 0.95% <= p < 1.5%
[ 2%] 1.5% <= p < 2.5%
[ 3%] 2.5% <= p < 3.5%
...
[99%] 98.5% <= p < 99.5%
[100%] 99.5% <= p < +oo
May be too difficult for end users, but nice for development.
Another question would be, what is best:
* Showing the percentage relative to the number of already coded frames
* Showing the percentage relative to the number of expected frames
Both have advantages and disadvantages.
--
Frank Klemm
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
