----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] --voice
> > Another question :) Is there a preferred (or even mandatory)
> > sequence to command-line opions for Lame ? I remember how quirky
> > DOS could be in this respect
> >
>
> The only problem is if you use incompatiable options - LAME
> does not check for this. Examples would be -h and -f
> together, or -k and --lowpass together.
>
Thanks - I'll watch out for that.
I've just been trying to help someone with re-encoding from 160/128 down to
96 kbps for his portable player so I offered >-mj -b 96 --mp3input<. This
works fine but took longer than expected (perhaps because Lame seems to
automatically resample down to 32 kHz ?), - are these the best options for
optimal quality/filesize at 96 kbps ?
The quality sounds reasonable on my cheap PC speakers - about the same as FM
radio.
Sorry about wandering off topic - I'll cease and desist after this :)
Eric
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
