> From: "Steve Lhomme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resampling just add/delete samples from the original If you mean that literally, that's a very bad way to do it. :) Take a look at SoX, which provides several resampling algorithms with different tradeoffs. I think the resampler in LAME is roughly "mid-range" against those in SoX. Time stretching is the same operation, but in practice I guess the noise shaping should be different, on psychoacoustic[al?] grounds. -- Mat. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) mailing-steve
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) alex . broadhead
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) Steve Lhomme
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic... Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) Markus Fick
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) Frank Klemm
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) mikecheng
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) mikecheng
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic... alex . broadhead
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic) Jaroslav Lukesh
