* Mark Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000920 11:38]: > Have you checked what is happening with top? Are you short on > memory? Maybe it's swapping. This isn't really a lame problem, but a > general UNIX issue. Have you tried getting it to run lame with a lower > priority, using nice? It's not swapping. I agree it's not a lame problem. I believe it's a liveice-xmms issue. Same occurs when running lame at a nice value of 10. Sorry to have bothered you. Regards, Todd -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Todd Goodman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Todd Goodman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Mark Powell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Todd Goodman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Scott manley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame ... Todd Goodman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Mark Powell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame ... Todd Goodman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Live-XMMS 1.0.0 and Lame 3.87 Whatever