Akos Maroy wrote: > > Gabriel Bouvigne wrote: > > > I'm not sure about the lowpass option. I think that the default > values are > > quite appropriated. Do you really need to override this option in > your case? > > I think the default lowpass values are quite useless, especially in low > bitrate encodings. I'm doing live mp3 streaming with icecast, and > generate a 24 kb/s 22.05kHz stream (along the 96 kb/s stream). The > default lowpass for 24 kb/s is about 4.5kHz, which is totally > unaccaptable. If I override it to 8.5kHz, it's quite OK. > > At first this whole automatic lowpass troubled me quite a lot. IMHO lame > should not imply any changes to the sound unless specified explicitly. > There could be a 'detect best' option, so that it would use all these > heuristic values, like downscaling the sample rate and/or applying a > lowpass filter. (The 24 kb/s 22.05kHz stream gets downscaled to 16kHz by > default, I manually have to override this so that there is no change.) > > Also, when using lame as a shared library, and calling all the > functions, I also found that there is an automatic lowpass generation. > This is even more annyoing. IMHO these features should only be at the > command line program, not when calling the API. > > PS: Could you change back the reply-to: field for the list? In 99.9% of > the cases I reply to the whole list, not the author of a given message.
What is stopping you from clicking on "Reply All" or "List Reply" ? > (Yes, I know the mailman doc recommends no reply-to: to the list.) -- David Balazic -------------- "Be excellent to each other." - Bill S. Preston, Esq., & "Ted" Theodore Logan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
