Greg, Doing everything at once was the most straightforward implementation, so that's what was done.
To allow gapless tracks to be encoded one at a time would require the use of temporary files, and no one bothered to write such code. Kind regards, - John Greg Ward wrote: > > Is there a good reason that you have to encode everything in one go with > --nogap? Or could this be changed? _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
