I think that the difference would be a lot smaller if you wouldn't have used the -k switch.
Regards, > i upgraded from lame 3.87 to lame 3.91 and i am a bit confused about the fact, > that lame is producing quite bigger files now: > lame -V 5 -b 96 -h -ms -k xxx.wav produced files with a bitrate of about > 140, now they are > 160, files with -V 0 are much bigger (about 50% of the > frames are at 320) now, too. actually, there is nothing really wrong, i guess > -V 7 (or whatever) in 3.91 will produce as big files as -V 5 in 3.87, but i am _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
