Raider : I agree with your opinion about quality but it's sometimes useful
(or interesting) to analyze how different settings of compression damaged
the original signal. I'd like to have one of this tool...
Raider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoy� par : Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mp3encoder-admin@minni cc :
e.tuhs.org Objet : Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Mp3 testing
tools
16/01/2002 06:57
Veuillez r�pondre �
mp3encoder
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 00:46, Vladimir Mincev wrote:
> Is there a tool that can compare two mp3 files with original and tell
> me which one is better quality (sounds more like original)?
> I already tried Mp3 Utility and EncSpot but none of them doesn't do
> what I want to. Any clue what tool can I use?
That particular tool is your ear. Some have a better hearing than you,
some have a more poor hearing than you. It's all up to your ears. And
as the medical science says - our ears aren't getting any better with
time. They are getting worse actually. So, make some tests, check
what's good for you and use that particular combination. Anything
beyond that is just a waste of bits.
With that in mind, getting software that does the comparison for you has
no meaning at all. It is made for other purposes. Like showing that
the Catalyst's encoder is broken or that the Winamp decoder was broken.
It is good to give you some "scientific" proof of what you actually hear
(noise, or some difference in dynamics).
Bottom line: if you are looking for that hypotetic "better quality" just
stick with the CDs.
Raider
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
