> Your report consisted of an insult, followed by a description of what you > did (good! steps to reproduce) followed by more insults and a threat to kill > someone. (I wouldn't take that lightly, although I am not the person > threatened).
I don't think laughing at the fact that LAME identifies source files by their suffixes is out of line -- Like I said, in the real world, doing such a thing would cause most professional coders to write you off completely. You can dance around it, and try and justify it however you like....it still smacks of amateurism, and you'de be wise to drop that practice in order to be taken seriously as a coder. Yes, It's that bad. You forgot to mention that I threatend to kill the original programmer, I also threatened bury and exhume his body several times, shoot him, burn him, and extract the phosphorous from his crushed bones in order to make fireworks which spelled out insults to his surviving family. If you're going to accuse me of something, at least be complete about it. Better yet, pull the stick out of your buttfile and #include <humor.h>. Jesus Christ... Is this all you do all day? > Well, that is a bit myopic -- I bet someone at Microsoft got fired for > looking into the files instead of (correctly) using the mime-type. Remember > the exploit that sent executables as sound/x-wav? Thats correct. Had they stayed true to the original RFC, there wouldn't have been a problem. Maybe you can apply the same logic to what I mentioned two paragraphs ago. > And then you probably didn't read the reply that explained in excruciating > detail that it is impossible to correctly recognize mp3 files by looking at > the bits ... > > Harald And then, you can move the bong away from your face long enough to read where I told him how to do it with ease. Cheers, Bowie _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
