http://lame.sourceforge.net/history.html
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use > Any reason to prefer Rosoft over EAC? I only see 'Mic'Rosoft over at > Hydrogen. > > And again, can someone point me to documentation giving the changes, bugs, > etc. of the recent LAME verisons? > > Thanx, > > Shel > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Some bug fixes and way faster than the previous releases. With Rosoft CD > > Extractor and a AMD Atlon XP 2000+ you can rip mp3 files at 25x. For > > Rosoft > > CD Extractor see http://www.RosoftEngineering.com > > > > > > Lars > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ranny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:15 PM > > Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use > > > > > > > Yes, I know that Latest release of lame is 3.93.1. But is it any good? > > > In Lame's site, it says that it is a stable version, but has anyone had > > any > > > good or bad experience with it? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:42 PM > > > Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use > > > > > > > > > > Latest release of lame is 3.93.1 > > > > > > > > Download from http://www.RosoftEngineering.com/cgi/lameenc.cgi or > > > > http://www.RosoftEngineering.com/cgi/alt-lameenc.cgi > > > > > > > > Lars > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Shel Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:09 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had recently set up LAME 3.93.1 to use with EAC, and it was > > suggested > > > in > > > > > a Hydrogen forum that I go with 3.90.2, which I was told was the > > last > > > > > version to be the most stable. > > > > > > > > > > Is there information somewhere that may list the pros and cons of > > the > > > > > recent versions of LAME when using it with EAC and RazorLame? > > > > > > > > > > Shel > > > > > > > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Some problems are still there but they are very rare. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Ranny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:15 PM > > > > > > Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > I heard that there were problems with LAME 3.93 > > > > > > Is the new LAME 3.93.1 o.k. to use or should I stick to ver 3.92? > > > > > > How is it better than LAME 3.92? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx > > > > > > Ranny > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mp3encoder mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
