On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:44:17 +0800
"John Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The logic of my currently working version is like:
> 
> wavmerge 1.wav 2.wav 3.wav 4.wav -o output.wav
> lame --alt-preset 56k output.wav output.mp3
> 
> However, because output.wav is huge, it takes up too much disk space
> as well as processing time for both "wavmerge" and "lame".

If you have a program which is able to merge several .wav files and
provide the merged result to stdout, you can pipe this output directly
into lame. Let's assume wavmerge is able to provide the merged file to
stdout by specifying "-" as the file name, then it would be:

  wavmerge 1.wav 2.wav 3.wav -o - | lame --preset 56k - output.mp3

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
           Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to