Geoff Shang wrote: > > Hi: > > The quality scale was reorganised between those releases. If memory > serves, what was quality 2 is now quality 3, with the quality 0 mode now > painstakingly slow. I use 0 if quality matters and I have the time, but > mostly I use 1 which is, at least in my experience 4-5 times faster than 0 > (maybe more).
Aha, "-q 1" is close in speed to what "-q 0" used to be (a little bit slower, I think, but tolerable.) Thanks! -- Jamie Zawinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jwz.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dnalounge.com/ _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
