Hmmm...
When I run:
lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3
The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at 22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments?
On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote:
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500
How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version?
LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. LAME3.96 uses 24.00kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56.
check "-s 22" option with lame 3.96.1. If the problem is solved, the player you used may have a problem with 24kHz mp3.
If not, I have no idea. -- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
_______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [email protected] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
