Hi Wesley,

This change really won’t be as painful as it sounds

Then why do I have to do a bunch of unexpected/unscheduled backup and 
book-keeping work before an arbitrarily chosen deadline? I’m not sure that 
springing this surprise on folks is the wisest course of action.

Cheers,
Dan.
—
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Architect (HPC Research)
d.hol...@epcc.ed.ac.uk<mailto:d.hol...@epcc.ed.ac.uk>
Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465
Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088
Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT
—
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with 
registration number SC005336.
—

On 3 Feb 2020, at 16:02, Wesley Bland via mpi-forum 
<mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>> wrote:

Because in the meantime, our testing remains broken and we don’t have another 
solution to fix it at the moment. We really want to have that testing fix.

This change really won’t be as painful as it sounds. There’s almost no Git 
commands required. No rebasing/merging/etc.

On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner 
<rabenseif...@hlrs.de<mailto:rabenseif...@hlrs.de>> wrote:

Why aren't we doing this when we finished 4.0, i.e. merged all the voted in
pull requests into the standard?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" 
<mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>>
To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" 
<mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>>
Cc: "Wesley Bland" <w...@wesbland.com<mailto:w...@wesbland.com>>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 4:38:48 PM
Subject: [Mpi-forum] Time To Open Source MPI

Hi folks,

** Look at the numbered list for your action items before 2020-02-18! **

Since we moved from Subversion to GitHub, there’s been a back and forth on
whether the MPI Standard Source code should be open source or closed source. As
you know (since most of you have access to it, we decided to keep the standard
closed for a few reasons (avoiding rogue copies of the Standard was a big one),
but recently, the scales have tipped back toward open sourcing and after
talking to Bill and Martin some more, we think it’s finally time to open up the
MPI Standard repository. Specifically, these are the issues that get addressed
by moving to a public repository:

* Participation to the forum has a barrier to entry (i.e. me)
* Our current automated testing system is broken and will not be fixed
* We rely on special dispensation from GitHub for free, private repositories

I’ll be discussing this in more detail in Portland, but I want to make folks
aware that this is coming now because it will have some impact on people who
are actively working on text proposals. The mitigations here should be pretty
straightforward and I have both slides (for a high level) and a wiki page (for
details) on what’s happening and what you need to do about it.

The short version for the purpose of this email and your action item leading up
the forum next week is to do two thing s:

1. Back up your branches.
2. Make a note for each of your open pull requests on where the are and what
issues they’re attached to.

Detailed notes and the slides I’ll present in Portland on how to do this are
here: [
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/wiki/Migrate-to-Public-Repository |
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/wiki/Migrate-to-Public-Repository ]

The plan is for me to flip this switch DURING THE FEBRUARY MEETING! This should
not disrupt any readings for the meeting itself as none of the pull requests
will actually be deleted, but they will all become stale and we’ll need to
re-open new ones. The main benefit of doing this during the meeting is that
if/when anyone has trouble, I’ll be there in person to provide live help to
anyone else that’s there (sorry, Marc-Andre, you’ll need to follow my slides
remotely \uD83D\uDE00).

Please email me if you have questions or concerns. If there’s enough demand, I’d
even be willing to do a short Virtual Meeting on this on Wednesday.

Thanks,
Wesley

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum

--
Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email 
rabenseif...@hlrs.de<mailto:rabenseif...@hlrs.de> .
High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 .
University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 .
Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . 
www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner<http://www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner> .
Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307) .
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum

Reply via email to