On Saturday 14 March 2009 17:59:00 Bill Hart wrote:
> Are you sure about that:
>
> case $host in
>           x86_64-*-* | i786-*-*)
>             path_64="x86_64/amd64 x86_64" ;;
>           k10-*-*)
>             path_64="x86_64/amd64/k10 x86_64/amd64 x86_64" ;;
>           nocona-*-* | core2-*-*)
> <<-------------------------------------
>             path_64="x86_64/core2 x86_64" ;;
> <<-------------------------------------
>         esac
>
>
> Seems to use the core2 code.

try with ./configure --build=nocona-unknown-gmu-linux and you get C
and done on a real Pentium D as well


>
> Bill.
>
> 2009/3/14 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>:
> > On Saturday 14 March 2009 17:41:58 Jason Moxham wrote:
> >> Early Intel CPUs with Intel 64 lacked LAHF and SAHF instructions
> >> available in AMD64 until introduction of Pentium 4 G1 step in December
> >> 2005. LAHF and SAHF are load and store instructions, respectively, for
> >> certain status flags. These instructions are used for virtualization and
> >> floating-point condition handling.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'll  find out model numbers soon
> >
> > No need for MPIR-1.0.0 , all 64bit  Pentium's default to nonoca which
> > leads to a generic C build.
> >
> >> On Saturday 14 March 2009 17:20:25 Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Jason Moxham
> >> > <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > I pretty sure all core2 cpus have lahf,sahf , it's just some Pentium
> >> > > D dont have it . You can test the lahf_lm feature bit in cpuid to
> >> > > see if it's got it
> >> >
> >> > Tested in:
> >> >
> >> > My laptop: model 6 / family 15 (core 2 duo T5300).
> >> > My desktop is family 15 / model 6 (pentium D 930).
> >> >
> >> > The "lahf_lm" feature is present in both according to /proc/cpuinfo.
> >> >
> >> > Note that the laptop is "low end" core 2 (in the sense it has no VT
> >> > extensions). The pentium D is "high end" (in the sense it has VT
> >> > extensions --- low end would be pentium D 8xx). Maybe that makes a
> >> > difference?
> >> >
> >> > OTOH, the kvm 64 bit virtual cpu (kvm 72) doesn't seem to know about
> >> > the "lahf_lm" (meaning, it won't report it in cpuid, even if the host
> >> > processor has it. I assume the instructions would work anyway.)
> >> >
> >> > Gonzalo
>
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to