On Apr 15, 7:11 pm, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
> Clicking on the graph does make it bigger, but yeah, the critical
> region we are talking about is a bit compressed.
I just took a look at the toom4 code. It looks like there is a lot of
unnecessary sign/size management and data copying. I would suggest
some serious optimisation work before making a premature decision to
dump toom4 in favour of toom7. I can't think of any earthly reason why
a toom7 would beat toom4/5/6 near the toom3-toom4 threshold. It's like
claiming that a strassen matrix multiply written in C is fast for a
10x10 matrix because you're comparing against an n^3 algorithm written
in python. Maybe the C-python analogy is unfair, but you get my drift.
david
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
