That switch is correct , there is something else though which is changing the 
behavour on solaris . 

On Saturday 22 May 2010 00:45:37 Bill Hart wrote:
> I thought the switch was in the relevant gmp-mparam.h, which should
> depend on the arch, not the OS?
>
> Bill.
>
> On 22 May 2010 00:45, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Friday 21 May 2010 21:13:31 Jason Moxham wrote:
> >> On Friday 21 May 2010 14:16:49 Bill Hart wrote:
> >> > Regarding time frame for the release, I really hope there are plans to
> >> > get mpir-2.0.1 out the door as soon as possible.
> >> >
> >> > I know Sage has been waiting on these gcd normalisation issues to be
> >> > fixed for absolutely ages. They still use mpir-1.2.2 !!!
> >> >
> >> > The significant holdups I see are:
> >> >
> >> > * broken with gcc 4.5.0 on ia64  - probably not an MPIR bug (may have
> >> > to blacklist this gcc on ia64 along with gcc 4.3.2 on all 64 bit
> >> > machines)
> >> > * some issue on another skynet machine - something to do with the
> >> > setup of the machine
> >>
> >> This is the make check failure on fulvia , it appears that gcc is not
> >> set up properly , I've have tried changing the flags , linker etc but
> >> could not get anywhere. This is the ELFCLASS 32 error
> >>
> >> There is also a duplicate symbol on this platform to remove , I'll look
> >> into this now
> >
> > Under solaris on fulvia , the generic c file preinv_divrem.c gets built
> > whereas on linux it does not get built , somewhere in configure? there is
> > a switch that turns off building it when we have it in mpn_divrem_1 , but
> > it only been done under (x86_64 & linux )  whereas we should have it
> > under all x86_64 any OS not just linux
> >
> >> There is also a make tune failure on rosemary , I can't seem to find
> >> rosemary , is it on skynet ?
> >>
> >> > * add copyi.c copyd.c to linux build (this is done by adding them to
> >> > mpn_functions in configure.in and running autoconf, automake, ON
> >> > BOXEN!!)
> >> > * document the normalisation changes in mpir.texi (if this hasn't
> >> > already been done - I forgot if I did it or not)
> >> >
> >> > I would focus attention on these so the release can be made.
> >> >
> >> > Bill.
> >> >
> >> > On 21 May 2010 13:07, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > On Friday 21 May 2010 07:54:49 Cactus wrote:
> >> > >> On May 21, 12:24 am, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 12:49:51 Bill Hart wrote:
> >> > >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > In the past few months I've been increasingly busy with my
> >> > >> > > research and looking at my calendar for the next few months
> >> > >> > > (urgh is it even years), I see I am going to have not as much
> >> > >> > > time as I would like to work on bignum stuff.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I think it is time to pass on the responsibilities I've had
> >> > >> > > within the project to some others.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I'll still be available to ask stuff and I'm sure I'll be able
> >> > >> > > to contribute some code from time to time.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I understand that the 2.0.1 release is quite close and I'll
> >> > >> > > still be available to help Minh through the process.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > The logical person to be in charge of linux stuff is Jason
> >> > >> > > Moxham (who is also capable of making releases) and of course
> >> > >> > > Brian is as always, in charge of Windows stuff. For
> >> > >> > > contributions for upcoming releases, please talk to these guys.
> >> > >> > > I'm sure they'll update everyone with any plans for releases as
> >> > >> > > they come to light.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Bill.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > OK , I'm happy to do it.
> >> > >> > From memory I believe this is what we have up and coming...
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > v2.0.1 is a gcd normalization and a few minor bugletts
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > v2.1.0 is a MSVC vs2010 update (assuming everything appears on
> >> > >> > time)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > There are some minor x86_64 assembler tweeks/updates , linux
> >> > >> > portions ready to go , and windows versions depending on how the
> >> > >> > MSVC update goes. My windows box is still in the shop so I can't
> >> > >> > do the windows bit for the moment.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Let me know when you add these to SVN and I'll look at doing it.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> When you say 'minor tweeks/updates', do you mean a few individual
> >> > >> instruction changes that won't need full conversion or full 'Linux
> >> > >> to Windows' assembler code conversion?
> >> > >>
> >> > >>     Brian
> >> > >
> >> > > Both , but mainly full conversion , I could do the simpler ones if I
> >> > > had my windows box back from the shop , I might get it back in time
> >> > > depends on what sort of time frame we expect for the release. if not
> >> > > we can delay until the next release.
> >> > >
> >> > > Jason
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > > Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send
> >> > > email to [email protected]. For more options,
> >> > > visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
> > to [email protected]. For more options, visit this
> > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to