The notices and links on their site now seem to be much clearer and
more correct. So it looks to me like they have made some effort to
attend to the requirements of the license.

Bill.

On 2 November 2012 20:35, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Not only do they not distribute the source code with the binary, but
> they do not even include the license. This is an egregious violation
> of the GPL and is not in the spirit of the license at all. I have
> written to the maintainer of the site to (politely) bring this to
> their attention.
>
> Bill.
>
> On 2 November 2012 19:41, Cactus <rieman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I came across this site:
>>
>> http://www.ospv.com/mpir-and-mpfr/
>>
>> which seems to be distributing MPIR (and MPFR) in binary form without giving
>> any references to where the source code can be found.
>>
>> I may be wrong but it seems to me that this does not comply with our GPL
>> license.
>>
>> Does anyone else have a view on this?
>>
>>     Brian
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "mpir-devel" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpir-devel/-/nFpNky3k19MJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to