On Monday, December 3, 2012 7:20:45 PM UTC+1, leif wrote: > > Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > On Monday, December 3, 2012 6:35:15 PM UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: > > > > Time to apply the crumb test to JP's beard with a fine-toothed comb! > > > > By the way, shouldn't Sage be a little faster on my Amstrad PC1512? > > > > Bill. > > > > On 3 December 2012 17:29, leif <not.r...@online.de <javascript:>> > > wrote: > > > Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Monday, December 3, 2012 6:13:57 PM UTC+1, leif wrote: > > >> > > >> Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > >> > Further info: > > >> > - the result of ./config.guess is > nehalem-apple-darwin9.8.0, > > >> which is > > >> > not one dealt with in MPIR configure.in > > <http://configure.in> <http://configure.in> for > > >> > > >> the "32 bit apple darwin > > >> > doesn't like our PIC format asm code". > > >> > - and so we get MPN_PATH=" x86/nehalem x86 generic" > > >> > > >> ... then the -march=core-i7 was pretty correct. > > >> > > >> Who t** f*** runs a 32-bit operating system on such a > > machine? (Dual > > >> quad-core Xeon even IIRC) ;-) > > >> > > >> I agree :) > > >> And that's the reason nobody complained until we explicitely > pushed > > >> people to do so :) > > > > > > > > > Well, YOU asked for it, so it's definitely your fault... ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > -leif > > > > In fact I just wanted to get rid of the dirty piece of code in sage spkg > > install script and hoped that nobody would actually answer on sage-devel > > so that the removal gets undetected. > > > How about changing > > # 32bit apple darwin doesn't like our PIC format asm code > case $host in > core2-apple-darwin* | penryn-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic/core2 x86/applenopic" ;; > prescott-apple-darwin* | pentium4-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic" ;; > pentium3-apple-darwin* | pentium2-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic" ;; > i686-apple-darwin* | pentiumpro-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic" ;; > core-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic" ;; > *) ;; > esac > > to just > > # 32bit apple darwin doesn't like our PIC format asm code > case $host in > core2-apple-darwin* | penryn-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic/core2 x86/applenopic" ;; > *-apple-darwin*) > path="x86/applenopic" ;; > *) ;; > esac > > ? (As far as I can see, the above snippet is in the x86/x86_64 (and > 32-bit OS/ABI) branch, so we don't have to deal with other archs than > these there.) > > Otherwise the build will (sooner or later) fail in exactly the same way > on newer CPUs on 32-bit Darwin. > > Btw, it would probably be better to use the applenopic/core2 path on any > post-Core2 CPU as well. Then we'd have to invert the logic, such that > the x86/applenopic/core2 path is *not* chosen / added on > i[34567]86-|pentium*-|prescott-|core- (all with 'apple-darwin*' > appended), but on everything else, hoping that the former list is > complete. (We won't have to add CPUs to that list as time goes by, in > contrast to the post-Core2 list.) > > > For the sake of Sage, it's probably better to patch MPIR 2.6.0's > 'configure' (i.e., the *generated* file) rather than 'configure.in' > (autoreconfing afterwards, which usually causes lots of file changes) > until 2.6.1 (with such a fix) is out. > > > It should be ok thanks to Jeroen spkg which choose the same version autotools as the one used, so producing minimal diffs.
> -leif > > -- > () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign > /\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpir-devel/-/YwJwyjdSG3AJ. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
