On Monday, December 3, 2012 11:58:39 PM UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: > > That's great. Thanks for the report and your hard work tracking this > down! I have added this issue to the mpir todo list, to be sorted out > once the next release it done. > > As you will see from my announcement on mpir-devel, I have been > distracted by something else for a couple of days. :-) > > Bill. > > I saw that!
To finish with the applenopic stuff, last reports from sage-devel: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/R43tQAKI8gA/UW4SKqk5oVcJ seem to indicate that the problem is really not with PIC code, but just the @GOT construction. Putting back the asm files involving specific PIC branches but not using @GOT in the applenopic directory (IIRC it is add_n.asm and sub_n.asm) does not prevent MPIR to build, nor to pass its test suite. So maybe we should rename the directory to applenogot and put the few files back in :) Not that anybody will really care about the performance difference if there is any. As I said, I've no experience in asm/PIC programming so cannot really say this analysis is right, but that's just experimental guesses. Best, JP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpir-devel/-/wg5Xk3mEPbwJ. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
