Bill Hart wrote: > Thanks Leif! Forwarded from Sage's trac: > Replying to jdemeyer: > > Why not unconditionally use static __inline__? > > I think that should work on all compilers. > Thought of that, too (already when we were fixing the test for clang), > but this way it's more explicit, and more importantly doesn't change > the test at all for older compilers. > > After all, upstream will decide...
Opinions? -leif > On 26 April 2015 at 19:41, leif <not.rea...@online.de > <mailto:not.rea...@online.de>> wrote: > > leif wrote: > > Similar to the issues we already had with clang, and as easy to fix. > > > > See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18247 for details. > > Upstream patch attached (only fixes acinclude.m4, not the generated > files, i.e., 'configure'). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
