I've heard it characterized as worse than anything in the last 20 years, worse than
anything during the Arne Carlson period.
And, maybe I'm slow, but I still just can't figure out the thinking behind it:
especially given the surplus. I'd love to hear the reasoning for it, from Ventura or
Jax or Shrunk or whoever it is who decided it would best fill the state's mandate of
educating our children. Maybe there's an additional home schooling component that we
haven't been notified of just yet, or maybe this ties in with the Bush plan of
shifting resources to religiously-controlled social service organizations.
Otherwise I just don't get it.
Claire Stokes
SWAPC, CBAC, 62B
> Good heavenly days. This reminds me of how things were when I was
> enrolled in MPS. That would be 90-93, a.k.a. the last recession.
>
> A 25% whack out of all non-referendum funds? THAT is one monster
> cut. Does anyone have any information on how this compares with the
> bad-old-days of the early '90's?
>
> Greg Riedesel
> Former MPS student
> SSP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
> Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
> http://e-democracy.org/mpls
_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
