Re: FW: [Mpls] Micromanaging Identity G roup Screenings

[ABerget]

Megan -

A couple of questions:

1) Why are Saturday's Stonewall recommendations subject to ratification at a
meeting in Northfield since these are local races?

2) How does "Acceptable" status differ from "Endorsed" status in Stonewall
parlance?

3) How many Stonewallers participated in Saturday's screenings?

4) Since not all local Stonewallers attending Saturday's screenings screened
all candidates, on what basis were screeners assigned to a group? Ie.,
random, self-selected, assigned? How were chairs/facilitators selected for
each group?

5) How were the wards assigned to the groups?

6) Did  one set of screeners interview and deliberate on the mayoral
candidates?

We talk a lot about the desire for "transparency" in government - and I think
it's valuable for those interested in the screenings to know what processes  
supported the outcome.

Thanks.
Ann Berget
Kingfield 10-10