Hmm... has a small diesel engine, batteries, and electric
motors, and uses less fuel and pollutes less than a diesel bus? Has
Metro Transit found a loophole in the basic laws of physics? I think
not- The power ultimately has to come from the diesel engine, whether
you demand a constant 100 horses from it and store said power in
batteries for peak demands or intermittently ask for 200 to 300
horsepower. In fact the current standard Metro Transit bus's engine
is of about the optimum size for efficiency, at about 1.7-2.0 liters
per cylinder. Smaller (car and light truck) and larger (locomotive)
engines are usually less efficient.
Perhaps Metro Transit needs to drug test some of it's
administrators as well as the drivers...
peace,
Dyna Sluyter from Hawthorne
--
Dyna Sluyter
friend of Bill W. and Harry B.
USPS TTO, 554 MVS tour 3 operator, 6610142('96 Mack MR tractor, 2.8m
wheelbase ) de N0EGF, qrv 70cm, 2m, 10-80m
proud IBT and APWU member for over 20 years, solidarity forever!
mk.1 Mini Cooper S, mk.2 Golf diezel, Ranger XL 4x4 longbed ("da
service truck")
R100GS mit seitzwagen, R65LS
Teledyne Titan, Santana, Trek 7300
Quickie GP, Fortress AeroEdge
running C/PM, DOS, Linux, and Mac OS. Micro who?
Amtrak 1007, highball!
_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
