Minneapolis is a minority part of a much vaster metropolitan urban area 
that does not conform in any rational sense to its political 
jurisdictions.  It spills well outside the metro councils borders into 
adjacent counties including at least two in Wisconsin.  The lack of a 
common sense of identity and corresponding political institutions inhibit 
this area from effectively dealing with many of the policy considerations 
it should.   The legislature is too tied up in statewide regional 
jealousies and overarching considerations.  The met council is ill 
configured and each of our counties are too fully tied up in their own 
business to fully investigate and act in a coordinated manner their mutual 
interests. All of our counties, and a very significant portion of the 
metropolitan councils domain are rural, and probably should always remain 
as such.  The lack of a rational universal metropolitan entity hinders the 
development of a common regional vision.

Rather than think about annexing Richfield as the 14th ward, Edina the 
15th, lets boldly go where no one dares: let's redesign the entire metro 
region from the top down.

In my opinion, the twin cities area can be beneficially thought of as a 
city-state in economic competition with the world. We should give some 
attention to reorganizing the geography of our political institutions to 
better meet the human, physical, and economic geography of our mini-state. 
(Minnesota's GNP would have ranked it just behind Israel and ahead of 
Portugal a couple of years back.  The twin cites are fully 2/3 of that)

I don't think a single metro government, or even a consolidated city county 
government is necessarily a good idea.  Rather than the Twin Cities regions 
more than 150 municipalities and other governmental entities, I believe it 
would be sound to have perhaps four or five redefined and re-chartered 
counties or perhaps Boroughs to help with the culture shift. Possibly no 
Minneapolis, and no St. Paul.  Clearly defined responsibilities would be 
passed to appropriate lower level entities, with the clear intent to 
deliver an "Optimal" level of local and neighborhood control.  "Optimal" to 
be defined by political process, once the new political arenas are built.

As an example of the kind of surgery I am proposing, imagine a combined 
Dakota and Scott County re-split only this time with a Mason Dixie line 
separating the rural south from the urban north. The North with a new 
charter from the State Legislature mandating and setting out supports for 
an Urban county, while the Southern portion is similarly re-chartered with 
a mandate designed to enhance and protect its rural characteristics. Result 
urban sprawl arrested. The specialized needs of both land uses more 
effectively met.  Most of our geographical boundaries are historical 
artifacts, drawn for long forgotten reasons, under no longer existing 
circumstances. They need not be sacrosanct.

Other concepts will flower, when exposed to the fertile ground of a new 
image of the region. Perhaps eventually instead of fighting city versus 
suburb jealousies we can begin to see a common vision for the region as a 
whole. Until then we will subsidize corporate raids across city lines and 
other zero sum games.

The inertia in front of any such effort is enormous. Their is no political 
position for anyone to aspire too, so it's on no ones radar. It is probably 
against the self interests of hundreds if not thousands of today's policy 
makers and a good many influential municipal employees. And yet even 
radical change can be accomplished, over time in steps.

I think it is appropriate to ask our candidates for public office how they 
view the rest of the metro area.  I'll understand hesitancy to consider 
political reorganization as feasible, but I'll be very careful to note 
whether or not a candidates rhetoric is considerate of the interests of our 
immediate neighbors and I will especially appreciate those who can 
incorporate a regional perspective in their vision of the future.



Earl Netwal   (12-9)
5344 36th Ave. S.
Minnepaolis, MN 55417
612-724-4392
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://eudora.voicecontact.com/vc3/index.html?enetwal%40qwest.net>Online<http://eudora.voicecontact.com/vc3/index.html?enetwal%40qwest.net>
 
Status:


_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to