In a message dated 12/9/2001 5:19:33 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> I think it might have been Andy Driscoll who said that some
>  cancers have not been proven to be definitely caused by
>  smoking, though it's well nigh impossible to deny the direct
>  link by inference.
>
True, some cancers have not been linked to cigarette smoking, and even the 
link between cigarette smoking and cancers that originate in tissues directly 
exposed to high concentrations of cigarette smoke has not been "definitively" 
proven.  However, I will settle for less than "definitive" proof that 
cigarettes are bad for my health.  

As I recall, Stephen J. Gould once said "Science works with testable 
proposals. You can never be absolutely sure that a proposal is correct, but 
one may show, with a high degree of confidence, that it is wrong..."  
Scientists generally settle for less than "definitive proof."  

> The question is
>  how to break the Gordion knot of items entwined and change
>  the situation so as to change the predictable outcomes.

I agree. That is what scientific research is all about.  And before you set 
about to change a situation, it helps if you figure out beforehand whether 
those changes will have the desired effect.  That's why it is important to 
figure out whether and to what extent a cause and effect relationship exists 
between various items.

>  The public schools have answered that they do not know or,
>  if they know, they cannot amend the situation as they are now
>  constituted.

The school board members say that the have been trying to bring about better 
education-related outcomes for 'disadvantaged students,' but have failed 
because of poverty and a culture of poverty, lack of parental involvement, 
and other factors over which they have little or no control.

I think steps could be taken to dramatically improve education-related 
outcomes for the low-achievers, and improve to a small degree 
education-related outcomes for the high achievers, resulting in a closing of 
the academic achievement gap.  What I have in mind includes a process of 
'untracking' the students, a more equitable distribution of educational 
resources, and less segregation of students by race and socioeconomic status. 
 I expect changes along these lines would result in less interpersonal 
violence, a huge reduction in EBD diagnoses, and less racial profiling.

However, the MPS administration and a significant part of the school 
community are committed to the ability-grouping model, an unequal 
distribution of some important educational resources (e.g., inexperienced 
teachers), and a policy of racial segregation.  Those policies need to 
change, and yesterday won't be soon enough.

-Doug Mann

Doug Mann for School Board
<http://educationright.tripod.com>


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to