A big thank you to Gary Schiff for posting this report.  I hope more
council members (especially Robert Lilligren) follow suit, and keep us
updated on their actions.  

List member Alan Hooker has debuted a political column at Lavender (it's
about time).  This is the first time I've read decent political analysis of
the local scene in a long time.  

http://www.lavendermagazine.com/173/173_news_19.html

The column talks about how Rybak will use the bully pulpit of his office to
aggressively lobby for the city to be able to offer domestic partner
benefits.  

The column also says that none of the Gay city council members seem so
enthusiastic:  

Here's what the column says:  

For more than nine months, I had supported his opponent in the primary
election, Lisa McDonald. What I knew I had learned about him through
opposition research and my brief chats with him at events. Therefore, you
can imagine my surprise when I discovered him to be more "gay" on several
GLBT issues than actual gay men elected to the city council.

To give you some idea of what I mean, when I asked the newly elected
council members if they thought an official GLBT advisory panel should be
created to give input to the mayor, council, and city departments on issues
impacting the GLBT community--much like the city's official Latino advisory
panel does--Schiff and Lilligren didn't think it was necessary. Both
emphasized that the council will contain three gay members, or, as
Lilligren phrased it, "Right now we're at three openly gay city
representatives on the city council; it [a GLBT advisory panel] is kind of
redundant."
==========================================
EY:  This is nonsense.  The gay representatives are elected to represent
their districts -- not the general gay community.  

Alan Hooker's column continues:

Don't get me wrong. I'm very happy that the council will have three gay men
on it. But if these guys think that they can be the representative voice of
the GLBT community, they may have forgotten how diverse and multifaceted
this 10 percent of society can be.

<snip>

On the topic of domestic partner benefits, and what can be done about the
state's refusal to let municipalities offer such benefits to their
employees, Benson and Schiff are interested in examining cafeteria-style
benefit plans, while Lilligren thought "it's up to the city to mend some
bridges with the state." Tell that to State Representative Tim Pawlenty, as
he tries to make denying domestic partner benefits his ticket to the
governor's mansion.

======================================
During the campaign, Robert was criticizing the former council -- including
Herron -- of not doing enough to aggressively lobby the state on that issue. 

On the Domestic Partner issue and the city -- Tim Pawlenty was interested
in the fact that George Bush had signed a bill that allowed DC to offer
domestic partner benefits.  Personally, I think this issue is one of local
control -- and usually Republicans are interested in more direct local
control.  

However I'd like to see Alan Hooker talk to other city council members --
not just the gay city council members.  All city council members need to
represent their gay and lesbian constituents.  Ironically, I do think that
the Gay candidates who lost, would have been more aggressive with pushing
gay friendly policies through the city council.   

I would also like to see a future column (preferably before the caucuses)
interview the major Republican and Democratic candidates for Governor.  I'd
also like to encourage folks who would be republican if not for those nutty
social issue positions the party takes, to come to Republican caucuses in
Minneapolis.  The party belongs to those who show up.  During the 2000
season, district 61 passed a sodomy repeal resolution, and district 60
passed a resolution to delete platform plank 4 -- which had most of the
social nonsense -- though not all.  That resolution passed resoundingly in
the 60th district -- but didn't pass beyond that.  

Eva
Eva Young
Central

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to