I have always hated abstention voting except in the case of
conflict of interest.  I have been unable to find in
Robert's Rules of Order abstention as a voting method,
perhaps somebody else has a source.  However it does say,
"No one can vote on a question affecting himself."  This
would verify the argument that voting on your pay raise is
improper.

In Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary we have the following
definition for abstain:  to refrain deliberately and often
with an effort of self-denial from an action or practice.

And since it isn't counted as a vote as Brian and Robert's
Rules seem to illuminate, it makes for a curious argument
that perhaps the representatives who vote as such are not
really voting at all.  In fact they had no vote on the
issue.  This is particularly important for representatives
who support alternative voting methods to help increase the
voices of minority populations and so firmly believe in the
right to vote.  It has to be hard to say to supporters, "Get
out and vote for me" and then when you get there you don't
vote for those who voted for you.  Also I've always felt
that organizations who were highly dysfunctional used
abstention to avoid facing up to the truth - or as I like to
say sometimes, "conflict avoidance."  Perhaps that is the
case here too.

So, IMHO, unless there is a conflict of interest, abstention
voting is really a non-vote and should be viewed as such.
Essentially, those people did not exercise their right to
vote.  For too long the media has put attention on those who
abstain - thinking it is strategic or highlighting their
efforts as if they have something important to say - or a
signal to future actions.  And in fact, we've been doing the
same thing on this list.  Highlighting those who abstained
and giving them more attention just propagates the action.

I say, they didn't vote.  Therefore, they shouldn't have a
say in what should happen and we shouldn't pay any attention
to them on the issue.  Thus, the outcome is that the vote
passed by a whopping margin.



R u s s e l l   W.   P e t e r s o n

Saint Michael, Minnesota
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________
"You can only fly if you stretch your wings."

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to