The Division of Solid Waste and Recycling (SW &R) expects to receive
$937,000 from Hennepin County in SCORE revenue in 2002.  Hennepin County
receives the funds from the State, and then distributes the funds to the
cities in the County by proportion of the households in each City.

If SW & R did not receive these funds, I would identify options for "making
up" the revenue.  If we happen to have a great year for sales of our
recyclables (similar to 2000), it is possible that these funds could
partially make up the offset.  If we have a "short" yard waste season
(drought, or a dry Spring and/or Fall), the reduced yard waste expenditures
could contribute to balancing the budget.  Ditto if we have lower than
expected garbage generation and therefore disposal costs.  If these "easy"
targets are not possible, I will look to reducing other expenditures
(equipment purchases, shortening the yard waste collection season, reducing
education expenses, etc.)  Options for cost savings/revenue enhancement
would be presented to the Council, with a recommendation for their
consideration from staff (me).

The "Bottom Line" is that the Division is an Enterprise Fund, and I have to
balance my Expenditures to stay within my Revenues each year.  The later in
the year that I learn about revenue shortfalls or unanticipated costs, the
fewer options I have to reduce expenditures. For instance, all trucks and
equipment have to be ordered by March 15 to ensure delivery for payment in
the Fiscal Year; by September 1, most of our Yard Waste cost center is
expended, etc.   In 1999 a very exhaustive study was made by the Council for
service and revenue decisions in the SW & R Fund.  They did not at that time
recommend curtailing any services, and did not reduce the Recycling Rebate.


Historically, the Council and Mayor have considered the Recycling rebate to
be "off the table" when fund balancing decisions are made.  Recycling is a
high cost operation---it does cost us more to collect and process our
recyclables than it does to collect and dispose of garbage.  However, the
State and the City have made the policy determination that recycling is an
important activity--the State requires us to provide recycling services, and
the City has made the policy decision to "reward" customers for their
efforts to recycle.  I would not expect that the City would reverse this
long-standing policy by reducing the recycling credit to those customers
that make an effort to recycle.

Sincerely, 

Susan Young, Director
Division of Solid Waste and Recycling
aka: The Trash Lady


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott McGerik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Minneapolis Issues Forum
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Save state funding for nhood recycling


On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Sean Gosiewski wrote:

> There is a budget cut from the House, that is being strongly proposed that
> would cut $10 million (of approximately 14 million) in funds that go to
> local governments for source reduction and recycling (SCORE FUNDS).
> 
> It would basically abolish this funding. These are funds that must be used
> on source reduction and recycling - the state auditor's recent report
> regarded this program as being very successful.

How would this affect the City of Minneapolis? What programs in
Minneapolis are funded by this fund? Would the Division of Solid
Waste have to eliminate the recycling credit that appears on our garbage
bills?

Scott McGerik
Hawthorne/Minneapolis
http://www.mcgerik.com/scott/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to