I think the closure of up to four small community schools in the East area is a much, much more thorny issue than just low enrollment and building costs as our MPS district would like us to believe.  The district is touting its move to support small high school learning environments for high school kids and telling us that for grade school kids small schools are just too darn costly.  
 
And as Rita Miller pointed out earlier on a posting, the MPS district has systematically manufactured low enrollment for our schools in our area to force their closings.  And we have the evidence.
 
Not to say that the Soutwest's magnet k-8's are not wonderful ~  most southwest Minneapolis schools are fantastic.  It is just that small schools are also a well respected, well researched, viable option to meet the needs of children from very diverse backgrounds.  And are a great way to prevent kids from falling through the cracks.  Our Somali families WANT to stay at our school because they are known, welcomed, and have a voice that is heard and they do feel a part of the community.  Statements echoed by my daughter's best friend's famliy who are Native American.   The  East area housing is more affordable for families than southwest's housing and we have more affordable housing coming our way.  We need our schools.
 
A main bone of contention for us is that we have been actively seeking the district's help to work with us to make these schools financially viable for the last three years.  We have conducted a number of well attended community meetings, some small meetings with board members, the superintendent, we have invited district number crunchers out to our schools...really the time and energy this community has devoted to sincerely trying to establish a small school task force with the district is unbelieveable.  And it never materialized.
 
Even last summer I met with our Area Superintendent Birch Jones, Catherine Shreves and a couple of other folks from our area to make sure small schools were on the district's radar so that the small school issue would not fall through the district cracks in light of its well-known budget woes.  AND to make sure that the district allows ample time for rational arguments, time to do the math, avoid the district spin, research the truth and again, figure out what is reasonable and what works best for the East area to have schools that the district will support.  
 
End result?  Hiawatha's principal receives a letter last week stating the tight timeline the district finds itself in meet to its goals to close three to four schools in our area.  We invited Birch Jones to our Hiawatha PTO last week and he confirmed the good news for our area.  Wouldn't it have been wiser to have been working with us on the solution for small schools three years ago when we first started asking questions and asking the district for a task force to address the small school viability issue?  Or how about five years ago when the district made a commitment to go back to community schools?  Don't get me wrong, the district has been great at listening and they are charming.  But that doesn't really help us.
 
And what's the enrollment at Southwest's Lake Harriet k-2 lower campus...250?  Shouldn't they be in the discussion to close and save the district money?  How about Pratt?  That building has to be the same age as our schools and what's its enrollment...50?   I know, I know, they are growing their school to be a k-5 community school.  We are talking about low enrollment and older buildings right?  In fairness then, lets close Southwest Minneapols Lower Lake Harriet campus, Pratt and one from the East area.  It's really about costs right?
 
Why are we allowing magnets to thrive and not supporting community schools?   How about really saving money and eliminating magnets and putting that programming in community schools?  More bang for your buck and perhaps a more honest and fair approach to educating our children?  And really, how does magnets jive with the district's goal to have children attend schools in their own neighborhoods and save the district transportations costs?  We allow magnets busing from one end of town to the other but our community schools are asked to shrink their attendance area even more.  What that means for Hiawatha Community School is that they will lose up to two bus loads of neighborhood kids.  And please, give us the exact dollars we are shelling out to send our students to Marcy, southwest's Barton and Ramsey etc. versus local community schools.
 
I truly believe the district has dropped the ball on small community schools and their potential.  Let's study this fiasco, and then lets talk about closing four schools, from our area and does this really need to happen and who is really benefits from their closures? 
 
Nafiz and Robin Halloum
Longfellow Residents
Hiawatha Parents

Reply via email to