> Despite reminders and warnings about decorum
> from the list manager, there recently was a
> defamatory comment ("but it would appear that
> he would rather pander to some of his
> constituents") about an elected public servant
> from a contributor who apparently lacked
> sufficient background information about the
> subject of discussion.
>
> This unjustified incident was never, to my
> knowledge, cited in a decorum reminder.
As much as I try to see all and know all, there are things I miss. But
our rules - which members are asked to read when they join - ask that if
you see something you think violates our rules, please contact me
directly.
>From http://www.e-democracy.org/mpls:
3. Complaints about a list member's behavior should be directed to the
list member and the list owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] These
complaints should not be posted to the list.
The intent of this guideline is to keep the list from becoming about the
list, rather than city issues.
This is a good faith, volunteer effort, folks. I miss a few things, but
I think as most member can attest, I try to respond quickly to any
complaints, large and small.
Sincerely,
David Brauer
List manager
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
