Roslaind Nelson's speculation about Biernat's possible implication of other
CMs may have some merit. There has been second-hand information circulating
that Biernat contacted some community members before his indictments became
public, seeking similar "dirt" on other CMs. Just rumors, but if true, it
would fit into Biernat's general MO -- take care of #1.

Perhaps the rats are turning on each other. Depending on the outcome of
Biernat's case, we will see if he sang like a bird to get himself a lighter
sentence and whether he does, in fact, know anything about others in public
office who may have betrayed the public trust.

What a sorry set of circumstances for our city if this is all true. Many
people in the community have been loyal to Joe, even in the face of bad
decisions and vindictive behavior. He sought sympathy rather than support
for his record. Instead of using his power of office to lead, he used it to
enhance his personal situation (this is true regardless of the outcome of
the criminal investigation).

Greg Luce's suggestion that he resign also has merit, but it is unlikely
that Biernat will do so. One could have hoped that these indictments at
least would have tempered his arrogance. Even if he is innocent as a lamb,
he should have resigned as chair of Regulatory Services and certainly should
refrain from voting on any matters that could be tied to his case, pending
the outcome of a trial/settlement. That would have been the statesman like
thing to do. Sadly, Biernat has never been a statesman.

Biernat's inability to see the bigger picture has always been his downfall,
along with a lack of leadership skills. Instead of avoiding even the
appearance of impropriety by refraining from participating in matters that
are tied to his case, he remains in a decision-making role. What a fool.

Fran Guminga
Bottineau, Ward 3


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to