In a message dated 7/3/02 4:33:38 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I for one am.  What is up with Minneapolis residents Ole Savior and Dick
 Franson running for some office or other every year?  Of course I support
 their right to run for public office but it seems that after the initial
 publicity of filing, they offer little or no reason to vote for them.  It's
 not because I necessarily disagree with views, it's that they make virtually
 no effort to engage in the discussion of why I should vote for them.  It
 comes across as more an ego trip than an effort to truly expound on an issue
 or mobilize a previously unmotivated voting block.
 
 Dean E. Carlson (over 30 years of not running for public office)
 Ward 10, East Harriet
 
<< 
 Dean was responding to Brandon's query below:
 > I guess Lucky Rosenbloom is hopin' he'll be lucky in this election. Is
 > anyone else turned off my candidates who seem to run in whatever race
 > happens to be open on the day the filing period begins?
 >
 > -Brandon
 > -Powderhorn Park
 
 
 _____ >>
Keith says: It is the 4th of July, God bless America. And may God bless 
America's stated goal of the separation of Church and State. 

I would like to advise and remind Dean, Brandon, and all other readers here. 
For the most part, the media will determine whether to "inform" you of the 
"...reason to vote for them". Them being the 'minor' candidates such as the 
above referenced Ole Savior And Dick Fransen. The media may be TV, Radio, or 
The Newspaper of the Twin Cities. It may also be the "medium" of yard signs, 
posters, handbills, booths, travel, phone banks and political patronage. 
Whatever the access is, Money Fuels Access. Soft money, hard money, cash, 
coin of the realm. Currency, a commodity that 'minor' candidates, almost by 
definition, do not have.

Leslie Davis, always media described "gadfly and perennial candidate," 
springs to my mind as an opinionated candidate who's message was blocked from 
public access. He spent his own money to promote the public's issues. And 
risked his life and health to reach you with his message.

Dean, when registered Mpls. Mayoral candidate Leslie Davis chained himself to 
a tall tree to protest exclusion from the Mayoral candidate's debates, did 
you go out on a limb with him? Did you demand your own right to hear the 
other 'minor' candidates explain to you, the "...reason to vote for them"? 
They wanted to tell you why, but they had no money; and no access to media or 
mediums. They were arbitrarily excluded from the debates. If you did not 
protest, you, and all silent others, share complicity in the censorship.

Brandon, did you experience a "bad taste in your mouth" when Leslie Davis was 
put in a choke hold, injured, arrested and charged with a crime for trying to 
access the Mayoral debate stage at the Minn. State Fair? He was a registered 
candidate trying to participate, debate and inform you of his 'take' on the 
issues at hand. Did you help in his legal defense to preserve free speech and 
participation in the electoral process? I do not think so. 

You and so many others did Nothing. And on this 4th of July you and others 
disparage and dismiss those trying to make their free speech heard. In this 
way you honor types like Mark Dayton, who can buy his way in; in cash. Or 
Buck Humphrey, whose name alone guarantees buckets of soft, and hard, money 
and media 'access' while he does, and knows, nothing. (My opinion of him 
through observation when he was collecting his pay in a patronage job at City 
Hall, under SSB.)


My opinion is your quick dismissal of independent voices will exclude your 
name sake, the other Brandon Lacey Compos. The one who switched parties for 
all the right reasons. The one who wants his small, queer voice to be heard. 
There must be two Brandons, or huge conflicts within one. 

Keith Reitman   NearNorth 
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to