Brian responded to me off list and  may well be correct.  The internet is an 
amazing thing that can provide information (both true and false).  Despite 
that, my searches could provide no information on my (quickly recalled) fire 
of Paris (Why can't the internet lie when I want it to?).  In further 
searches, this appears to have, in fact, been a spurt of post-war planning - 
sanctioned by Napoleon III in 1853.

The planner was Baron Georges Eugene Haussman and, though not always 
popular, he is - largely - the architect of modern Paris.  He pushed for an 
emphasis on wider streets, gas lighting, benches, more public buildings, a 
new park system and more (a Google search of his name will fine far more 
references then there are to a fire of Paris).

Jim McGuire
Como


Jim, are you sure that you aren't thinking of the Great Fire of London
in 1666? I don't recall Paris burning (at least not since the Gauls burned 
it in 52 B.C., as Julius Caesar reports in his Commentaries on the Gallic 
War).

But you are right that Paris's development has been highly directed
and regulated, ever since it was laid out as a Roman town in the first
century C.E.

BRM

Brian Melendez
St. Anthony West (Ward 3)


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim MCGUIRE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/6/2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Environmental Concerns, and more

Much as I hate bureaucracy, I have to agree with Tim on this one.
Paris,
for example, may be seen as beautiful (I haven't been there), but it was

heavily planned - after a great fire.  I hope a history buff can give me
the
year.

So, before we decide that great cities were built without planning (and
thus
dump zoning codes in Minneapolis) perhaps we should look at the hitory
of
urban planning (both modern and ancient - yes, I said ancient).

A good start would be the University of Melbourne's site on the history
of
urban planning:

http://www.arts.unimelb.edu.au/amu/ucr/student/1996/b.hill/wpurbpln.htm#
urbpln

Jim McGuire
Como





----Original Message Follows----
From: Tim Bonham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: mpls-issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Environmental Concerns, and more
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 17:10:47 -0500

  > Here's a few arguments some New Urbanists have against zoning:
  >
  > The most beautiful  cities in the world were built without zoning and
  > planning.
        A few years back, I visited for a few days at a friends new home
in
southern Indiana.  This is an area that has little or no zoning codes.
        My friends were rather upset about a new neighbor, who had
purchased the
house & an empty lot next door at the end of the cul-de-sac they lived
on,
and had proceeded to start a metal plating & recovery business there.
This
involved big, noisy, stinky operations for hours on end, often extending
into the night.  Plus the recovery part involved buying junked cars and
extracting metal parts from them.  The remainder of the cars sat there
in
his "junkyard" until once or twice a year when he had them hauled
away.  The activities of this 'neighbor' put a serious restriction in
the
enjoyment of their own home for everyone else in the neighborhood.
        And when they recently moved back to Minnesota, their house sold
for less
than expected, largely due to this business in the neighborhood.  They
actually had potential buyers who drove away without ever getting out of
their car, once they saw what was going on at the end of the street.
        So I would argue that zoning codes are very useful & protect our
homes.

Finally, I seriously doubt the accuracy of the statement "The most
beautiful  cities in the world were built without zoning and planning."
        I've read much about the plans for various European cities, seen
photos of
the city walls and the defensible gates built in them, read how city
parks
served as in-wall pastures & food gardens when a city was under siege,
etc.  One of Leonardo da Vinci's early jobs was to draw up plans for the
city of Florence.  Certainly these cities were planned!
        And I remember that in ancient Rome, the prime land on the 7
hills was
reserved for people of the Equestrian class or higher.  Plus there was
the
Forum area, set aside for public speeches, with the surrounding area
mainly
political & city buildings & temples.  There was also the city market
and
commercial area, etc.  Pretty close to what we would call zoning
nowdays.

Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish-Ericsson

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to