There is a difference between zoning and planning. There are examples of
planned cities such as the Roman colonia (coloniae?) and Hausseman's
Paris....modern zoning is a response to the rapid growth of industrial
cities and an effort to keep residential areas separate from ugly,
noisy, polluting factories...in the post-WWII era it became a way of
locking in the  status quo in middle-class residential
neighborhoods....more recently,  zoning has a lot to do with cars ,
parking and big-box-style retail shopping than factories....for
instance, I've heard of some suburbs that require two and 3-car garages.

The stated idea of requiring 2 and 3-car garages is that it keeps cars
out of view on the driveway in front of the house...but it's unstated
reason is to keep people who can afford only a one car garage (or none)
out of that community.

I find it interesting that this thread began with the observation that
more people in Minneapolis are paving over their yards for parking.
There was an article in the NY Times about this nationwide
phenomenon...I suspect the reason for paving over the backyard has to do
with the high price of housing and increasing number of people moving
back into their parents' home or doubling up....also the increasing
sprawl and the growth of low-wage jobs out in the burbs requires more
lower income people to keep a beater or two in the back yard ( in case
the primary  beater doesn't start).

Lower income neighborhoods bear the worst of the automobile's danger,
ugliness and pollution. The Central neighborhood for instance has more
than its share of smelly autobody shops, car washes, filling stations
and acres of asphalt. Linden Hills has much less of this stuff.

If every residential Minneapolis neighborhood had to accept the full
impact of the automobile's environmental effects.....no NIMBY...I'd bet
we would once again have the finest streetcar system in the world.

I would prefer to see environmental problems taken care of at the
source, and that takes planning. When we restrict filling stations in
our neighborhood, unless we agree to drive less or give up
driving...those stations will be located in neighborhoods that wield far
less political clout.

I agree that a paved over back yard is ugly ( I live next to one) but I
would prefer to see long-range city-wide and regional planning  to
address this problem...with greater emphasis on transit.....not just
zoning.

Ken Avidor
Kingfield


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to