I sat on the Lowry Corridor advisory committee for the Bottineau
neighborhood and was also a member of the citizen group that selected the
developer (I was the only one voting "no" for the developer selected because
of what I perceived as a poor citizen participation model in the proposal.)

I generally support the plan concepts, but I also share some of the concerns
expressed by Bruce Shoemaker and others about some aspects of the Lowry
corridor plan. In addition to the BNSF viaduct, the Lowry Avenue Bridge is
another barrier to smoother traffic flow, besides being a safety hazard and
an environmental danger to the river because of its open grid road bed.
There are no plans to replace this aging structure.

I do believe that a better model for citizen participation exists, but it is
hardly, if ever, employed. Citizens should be involved way before a plan is
conceived so that those closest to the problem can help set the project
parameters. If we want to use the Lowry Corridor planning process as a
rallying point for better citizen participation, I'm all for it.

Having said all of that, however, I know that few people attended the public
meetings. I live within a block of Lowry, yet I was the only resident on my
street that attended any of the meetings. They were publicized in the local
press and through letters to neighborhood associations. I insisted at the
outset that each property owner within a block of Lowry be sent a letter
informing them of the planning process. I wrote at least two articles for
the monthly Bottineau newsletter and attended a neighborhood meeting to
explain in detail what was being promoted for the corridor. I asked
neighborhood people to contact me directly if they had questions or concerns
(only two did so).

Frankly, the Bottineau residents showed little interest in the plan even
though I emphasized that houses and businesses along the south side of Lowry
would probably be eliminated. Residents have to make an attempt to attend
the meetings early on in order to have any meaningful participation in the
planning process. Numbers do count. The northeast portion of the plan will
not be implemented for several years, so there is time for changes to be
made if residents make their voices heard.

Fran Guminga
Bottineau


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to