The Mayor and most of the City Council want an 8% each year for the
next decade.  At 8% per year, city spending doubles in just 9 years. 
How many of us expect our income to double in the next 9 years?  If the
city takes twice what they do now, where will each of us spend less?

Doubling again in 9 years makes for a budget 4 times today's in only 18
years.

Overall inflation has nearly gone away.  Its down to a percent or two
per year.  So why does the city need want more?  They haven�t told us
what they want to do with it, only that they want parks and libraries
to spend less.  

If parks and libraries spend less and at the same time the total goes
up 8%, somebody is getting a really nice bump.  Who is it?


David Brauer asked: �Is it fair to fold the library boards' referendum
money within the levy cap? The library board received specific voter
approval for that money - shouldn't it be counted on top of whatever
cap is set? I mean, maybe it means lowering the 8% limit to 7%, or
keeping the 8% plus the referendum money.�

[Terrell responds]  The voter is the highest authority.  The voters
decided to spend that money.  Though the Council may not like what the
voters decided, they should not be doing an end run around the results
of that election.

The Park Board, most of them anyway, doesn�t seem to be at all
concerned about how much money they spend.  They now want to take some
of the prime property in the city for their palatial suite of offices. 
That they have well over a hundred administrative staff working in
their central office raises the question of what all those people are
doing.  There is no shortage of office space downtown, where they are
currently officed, with more space becoming available.  Why, again, do
they need the �Palace on the River�?

Parks wants to build a new �art center� in Loring Park.  There is no
support in the neighborhood for it, the current building in Loring Park
gets little use.  The proposal replaces a collection of trees with a
building and takes away a few street parking spaces that are much
needed in the neighborhood.  Oh, by the way, where are they going to
get the money to fund programming in the proposed art center?  There
isn�t a bunch of extra money floating around.  Adding programs, even
maintenance expense for new buildings, shouldn�t be in the cards.

Hmm... maybe the city should remember that adding programs shouldn't be
in the cards for its budget too.


Terrell Brown
Loring Park
terrell at terrellbrown dot org


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to