Scott Nieman writes:

> Until the recent shift in school funding I
> know that the Park Board's property tax only represented 5 to 6% of
your
> tax bill.  If you paid $2,000 a year in taxes only about $120 went to
the
> Park Board.  That amount supports foresty, operations and maintenance,
and
> recreation programs we all utilize and enjoy.  I'd like to know what
city
> program delivers the value the Park Board does for that amount of
money.

Scott, the city delivers quite a bit more than the Park Board, so it
deserves more of the money. I'm open to your argument that the Park
Board is more effective at spending tax $$, but your argument seems more
anecdotal/emotional than factual at this point. No one is saying the
Park Board is solely responsible for the problem, only that they must
bear their share of the solution.

As I understand it, the city is trying to go back to a formula on how to
share Local Government Aids agreed to in 1994. I assume you were party
to that deal, though I don't know if you supported it. What's wrong with
going back to that formula now?

I'm seeking facts here, because I really do have an open mind. I believe
emotion has caused us to make many foolish "investments" that we now
have to pay for.

David Brauer
King Field 

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to