|
Hello All,
After canoeing this past weekend through the acres
of milfoil on Calhoun (the worst I've ever seen it), I have a question for Park
Board Commissioners who regularly post and other concerned citizens regarding
the health and safety of our lakes: what is going to be done, both in the
short term and in the long term, to rid our precious lakes of this noxious
weed?
I know that the Park Board has tried pests in cages
at Cedar, with limited results, and I have a feeling that the big blue
harvesters are just providing an aesthetic solution to the problem. As a
swimmer in Calhoun, I know that the harvesters leave lots of tendrils of the
milfoil loose and then those pieces are free to re-establish themselves
elsewhere in the lake. The harvesters don't seem to be doing what people
think they are, they are simply shearing off the tops of the plants and
encouraging stronger root growth (like cutting back any plant) and leaving lots
of free-floating cuttings. What about the idea of chemically "killing" the
entire lake and then, when the milfoil is completely eradicated, re-stocking it
with fish? Is there research available as to the benefits/risks of
the various methods of ridding lakes of milfoil?
I know people have touted the heightened bass
fishing in Calhoun as a result of the "habitat" provided by the milfoil (see
STrib article quoting Park Board's Jeff Lee this past weekend), but I don't
think that that benefit justifies our allowing this non-native weed to multiply
and potentially damage our great lakes in perpetuity.
Any and all comments welcome.
Tracy Nordstrom
East Calhoun
|
- [Mpls] Milfoil on Calhoun Tracy Nordstrom
- [Mpls] Milfoil on Calhoun Terrell Brown
- Re: [Mpls] Milfoil on Calhoun KarenCollier
- Fwd: RE: [Mpls] Milfoil on Calhoun Annie Young
