-----Original Message-----
From: Tracy Nordstrom

 
After canoeing this past weekend through the acres of milfoil on
Calhoun (the worst I've ever seen it), I have a question for Park Board
Commissioners who regularly post and other concerned citizens regarding
the health and safety of our lakes:  what is going to be done, both in
the short term and in the long term, to rid our precious lakes of this
noxious weed?  
 
I know that the Park Board has tried pests in cages at Cedar, with
limited results, and I have a feeling that the big blue harvesters are
just providing an aesthetic solution to the problem.  As a swimmer in
Calhoun, I know that the harvesters leave lots of tendrils of the
milfoil loose and then those pieces are free to re-establish themselves
elsewhere in the lake.  The harvesters don't seem to be doing what
people think they are, they are simply shearing off the tops of the
plants and encouraging stronger root growth (like cutting back any
plant) and leaving lots of free-floating cuttings.  What about the idea
of chemically "killing" the entire lake and then, when the milfoil is
completely eradicated, re-stocking it with fish?  Is there research
available as to the benefits/risks of the various methods of ridding
lakes of milfoil?


[Terrell]  Seems as the milfoil came earlier this year.  

It wasn't that long ago that it seemed the harvesters would show up
about Aquatennial time. This year they've been in the lake for at least
a month, albeit, I haven't seen any evidence they have been doing any
harvesting.

Anybody know why the canal between Lake Calhoun and Lake of the Isles
isn't clogged with milfoil?  Even Lake of the Isles which is generally
a much shallow lake.

I'd be concerned about chemically killing the lake, which would
probably be 4 lakes as Lakes or the Isles, Cedar and Brownie are
connected.  Can we realistically think that people (and likely a few
animals) wouldn't be adversely affected?  

While I have heard of lakes being chemically killed, I've never heard
of it being done in the center of an urban area.  It's my understanding
it is a multi-year process.

Do we even want to try to keep people out of these lakes for several
years, not to mention not eating the fish that would get caught before
the chemical killed them.

Yes, I'd like to get rid of the milfoil, but chemical treatment is just
waving so many red flags that I can't feel comfortable with it.




Terrell Brown
Loring Park (where they drained the pond a few years back and put a
liner on the bottom)
terrell at terrellbrown dot org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to