I am truly amazed by the Pioneer Press posted account of some of Randy
Staten's comments concerning the Johnson-Lee vs. Police Federation issue as
well as the Mayors "handling of the shooting".  I believe the Mayor acted
with the utmost sensitivity to the issue and more importantly acted
correctly.  There is a difference between the two deaths and Rybak gave this
difference the smallest amount of consideration as possible because of
sympathy for the dead assailant's family.  It would have been understandable
if Mayor Rybak had taken the opportunity to make political hay, but to his
credit he did not.

The naked attempts to mix race into this issue by some such as Staten is far
more troubling. Such efforts are problematic because of their divisiveness
and the possible backlash they may spark. Giving opportunities to others to
also play the race card by pointing out assault rates of one race upon
another and other such crime statistics.  I can remember no time or
situation when the white population attacked Sales-Belton for any comment or
action against a white person because she was Black and they were White. >
"Staten and others also criticized Rybak for his overall handling of the
shooting and fallout for not defending Johnson Lee's comments.   The forum
crowd cheered Staten's statements and echoed his call for Delmonico's
resignation.

>"The mayor of Minneapolis was irresponsible in how he dealt with this
question," Staten said. "We can't let him off the hook."

Even if Mr. Staten were correct, and he is not, I would think he would be a
little more understanding and forgiving.  I think Mr. Staten was happy the
community appears to have "let Mr. Staten off the hook" for far more
troubling indiscretions. Mr. Staten should remember Jesus' words about those
without sins casting the first stone.  Mr. Staten needs to wait for a lot of
other people to throw their rocks first, if they wish.  But he certainly
should not be the starting pitcher.

Mayor Rybak and Councilperson Johnson-Lee seem to be wisely advising that
this be put in the past and allow healing to take place.  We all should
follow that lead because there are far more important things going on in
this city and certainly real issues of patterned discrimination against
communities of color by the City of Minneapolis.  Real issues such as a
failure to afford equal protection and policing in communities of color, and
protection for families of color, get lost in such political demagoguery.
The house is on fire and threatens to be consumed while Mr. Staten is
worrying about what shade of green the back porch got painted. It is time
for the real community  "Leaders" to start exercising some leadership.

Martin Luther King said we need to look at the content of a man's character
rather than the color of his skin. We also need to look at the content of
the message, not the shading of color our own preconceptions might ascribe
to the meaning of each word in that message. WE, all of us, need to stop
this black-white, them-they stuff and start talking about "OUR" problems,
and how "WE" solve those problems.



Jim Graham,
Ventura Village

----- Original Message -----
From: Dooley, Bill
To: Discuss Minneapolis (E-mail)
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 7:44 AM
Subject: [Mpls] Police Union Letter


According to today's Pioneer Press, the police union letter condemning CM
Johnson Lee was not signed by Union President Sgt. John Delmonico (who was
on vacation) but by Minneapolis police officers Cpl. Lyall Delaney and Lt.
Dan Roen. See "African-American groups upbraid mayor; police union."
http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/news/local/3858034.htm?template=c
ontentModules/printstory.jsp

Has it been reported before that Delmonico did not sign the letter? Was
Delmonico's signature stamped or did the letter actually bear the signatures
of Delaney and Roen?

Bill Dooley
Ward 13
Kenny

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to