I was attacked by a dog as a kid of about 6--not a pit bull. I was 
attacked by a dog as an adult--not a pit bull. Should we ban German 
shepards? Both times, it was a shepard that bit me.
So long as we keep dogs as domestic "pets" that will happen. From the 
point of view of the bitee I'll bet it could be a mico-poodle and it 
would still scare them and leave puncture wounds.
Remember Buster Brown, "Hi, I'm Buster Brown, I live in a shoe. Here's 
my dog, Tag, he lives here too?" Tag was a pit bull.
WizaardMarks, Central

Chris L Beckwith wrote:

>Ralph wrote:
>
>>Did you ever think about your inner city
>>
>residents that abuse these dogs
>
>>should possibly be banned?
>>
>
>Chris responds:
>
>Having read the replies to my original post on
>banning pit bulls, I'd like to respond  by saying
>though it is clear there are a number of strong
>animal sympathizers here, I believe their
>sympathies concerning  pit bulls are utterly
>misplaced and, frankly, as the above indicates,
>somewhat out of touch with the practical realities
>of the issue.
>
>First, let's blow a fallacy out of the water:
>There seems to be an unspoken, rather naive faith
>in the syllogism that because dogs make good pets
>and pit bulls are dogs, pit bulls therefore make
>good pets. Nonsense. I have no idea why defenders
>continue to believe they can peddle the twaddle
>that pit bulls are merely the victims of bad P.R,
>bad owners and bad treatment. In short, that these
>are good pets whom we have obviously failed when
>they turn vicious. Whether the failure is natureor
>nurture, I'll  leave that indecisive, indulgent
>debate to the dog pound Hamlets; it's a moot
>concern compared with the issue of a badly mauled
>child. So, to the defenders: spare us the violins
>for these "misunderstood" dogs because you're
>playing for the wrong victim. Ultimately, I don't
>give a damn why a particular pit bull attacks a
>kid; I care about the kid. And there is no
>satisfactory post facto explanation that
>rationalizes why any kid (or anyone) should get
>ripped apart by a dog on a city street. None.
>Nada. Get it? The story about the dog doesn't
>matter.
>
>Concerning the claim that if we banned pitbulls,
>we should in turn ban dobermans, rottweilers, etc,
>or God help us, that we can't ban pits bulls
>because we don't even really know what a pit bull
>is - this is nothing but a silly rhetorical shell
>game. The CDC seems to have no trouble telling us
>which breed leads statistically in the number of
>attacks on human beings. (No guesses there!) So,
>given the odds, anybody care to wager the house
>payment on what kind of dog will be cited next
>time there's a local report about a canine attack?
>If the issue had money riding on it, no doubt our
>dog pound Hamlets  would come to their common
>senses quickly enough. But the point is, we
>already are gambling. And I sure as hell don't
>like the odds when it comes to pit bulls.
>Particularly when there's an incentive to exploit
>them in the underground economy.
>
>Until we live in the perfect world where animals
>(and people) are treated humanely, we will
>continue to see pit bull attacks. That's a fact.
>Just hope it isn't your kid confronting an enraged
>pit while on their way to school some morning. The
>people of this city shouldn't have to worry just
>because some idiot forgot to latch the dog gate or
>briefly left their back door open. And local
>politicians better be willing to do alot more than
>than merely pronounce the result "tragic" and
>"unfortunate," which does nothing and assures no
>one of anything except to expect another "tragic"
>and "unfortunate" incident. Regarding pit bull
>attacks, it's no longer an "if" question, but a
>"who," "when" and "where" question. I think a
>strong case can be made that the "where" should
>not be here.
>
>Chris Beckwith
>Ward 6
>
>
>
>_______________________________________
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to