Jim, And how is it substantively distinct from the list we are currently participating in? I mean other then the obvious, that Jim is the moderator accountable to no one rather than David who is accountable to an elected board of directors?
Joseph Barisonzi Lyndale, Ward 10 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Mork Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mpls] Mplscivicdiscuss OK, one last try. I'm going to change the charter for Minneapolis Civic Discussions: Unlimited posts, unmoderated, no residence requirement. I do request that place of RESIDENCE be stated in a signature. Neighborhood is nice but not required, city will do. And the other thing is not a rule but a hope that the bulk of discussion will be about Minneapolis to justify the title of MINNEAPOLIS civic discussions. However, I think I'll say that issues that have a lot of impact on Minneapolis, such as state taxes and Highway 62 widening are very legitimate discussion topics. This is a significantly different set of parameters from anything I see out there. If people don't subscribe, I'll bow to the marketplace (yes even leftos do it) and kill the group. Jim Mork (Cooper/Longfellow/Minneapolis) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
