Jim's post strikes me as a perfect example of just how silly the concepts of
"left," "right," and "center" are, when used as political identifiers.
Perhaps they always have been, but they sure seem to be getting sillier by
the day.

One of Ed Felien's biggest issues in his race against Peter McLaughlin is
Peter's wholehearted support for a public financing stadium deal.  I know
that Bob Velez is bringing up the same concern in Hennepin County district
one (which includes part of Minneapolis, even if not wholly contained by our
fair city, David).  

Now, is opposition to public stadium financing a "left," "right," or
"center" ideological position?  

Well, Felien and Velez are Green Party endorsees.  Two of our ten key values
are "Social and Economic Justice" and "Personal and Global Responsibility."
Spending taxpayer dollars on stadiums violates both principles.  To tax the
middle class and poor to build a wealth-increasing machine for the wealthy
is profoundly unjust.  And if the owners, players, and business owners who
benefit from a new stadium want or need one so badly, they should take
responsibility for it themselves.

So - it's a left-wing political position.  Eddie's a rabid leftist.

But wait!  Eva Young and others who would certainly not characterize
themselves as "left of the left" agree!  On closer inspection, one finds
that opposition to taxes of all forms and for almost all purposes is a
classic right-wing position.  Hmmm.  So maybe Eddie's a closet right-winger.

But wait!  Our governor, who sees and speaks of himself as the most centered
of centrists (splitting the hair of the Republicrats, in my view) opposes
public financing deals too!  So Eddie's appealing to the "sensible center."

I hope I've pointed out how this sort of weird geography of politics just
serves to cloud and muddle the debate.  Votes, in my opinion, should be cast
for the individual whose ideas are similar to one's own - the whole
principle of representative democracy.  If you favor spending public dollars
for private stadiums, Peter McLaughlin is your guy.  If you think the county
shouldn't be in the business of making more money for (it's official!) the
wealthiest man in Minnesota, a vote for Ed Felien - and Bob Velez - would
make more sense.  No matter what your self-described position in the
metaphorical road.


Robin Garwood
Elected Member, Minneapolis/5th District Green Party Steering Committee
Seward

P.S.  I'm loathe to step into the whole Urban Ventures debate - I really
wish it would go away and stop coming back - but I feel the need to point
out that Jim really missed the point with his comment: "how do you fault a
Church Organization for preaching their beliefs."  It's not about faulting
them for preaching their beliefs, Jim.  It's about not FUNDING them to do
so.
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to